Posts

Showing posts with the label censorship

Like to know what's in Grange? Most years Penfolds has to break the law to tell you

Image
Grange. Australia's most famous wine. The red that put our country on the world's quality wine map. Yet most years Penfolds has to break the law to tell people what's in it. If you think that sounds like madness, well, yes, it is. Yet Wine Australia, the federal government body that controls how wine is labelled and promoted does, outlaw telling the truth about Grange and many other wines blended from different regions. This is the idiotic bureaucratic regulation that defines the offence: (Click to enlarge) And the section of the Australian Grape and Wine Authority Act 2013 that the regulation refers to: The problem arises because the grapes that end up in Grange regularly come from more than three regions as the company website explains. So Penfolds is in breach of the law with this reference in its tasting note for the 2010 Grange: VINEYARD REGION Barossa Valley, Clare Valley, Adelaide Hills, McLaren Vale, Magill Estate Oh no! Five GIs mentio...

James Halliday as Wine Australia would censor him

Image
The repressive attack on freedom of speech by Wine Australia has not yet reached the level of stopping wine journalists giving sensible information to consumers. But should a wine maker or retailer dare to quote the words of James Halliday, the country's most famous wine writer, they would face two years in jail. To give you an idea of just how ridiculously draconian Wine Australia's censorship powers are, we reproduce below h ow a recent Halliday column would need to be censored to conform with Wine Australia's law. And if you think you know what the blacked out words are, enter Censored by Wine Australia's competition by sending your guess at what the illegal words are to: richard@politicalowl.com.  There are $50 wine voucher that can be redeemed at glug.com.au for correct and/or witty entries. Click on the column to enlarge it.

Wine Australia chairman's company breaking own law that carries a two year jail term

Image
They might proudly call it Méthode Tasmanoise but the Hill-Smith family, who purchased Jansz in 1997, seem quite keen to stress a French connection. You will notice, for one thing, that their sparkling is made by the Méthode Tasmanoise rather than the Tasmanian method. But that's a minor dipping of the lid to proper champagne compared with other French references on the Jansz website .  References like this: In 1986, esteemed Champagne house - Louis Roederer partnered with the owners of Heemskerk Wines to produce Tasmania’s first premium vintage sparkling wine. They saw the similarities between the climate here and the famous wine region of their homeland. And this: It could be argued we’re completely mad growing grapes in the wild and unforgivingly cold Tasmanian environment. But there’s méthode to our madness. The climatic conditions of the Jansz vineyard rival the famed French wine region of Champagne. In fact, it was originally with French contribution that Jansz ...

Win free wine in the Wine Australia censorship contest

Image
The federal government body Wine Australia has decreed that the glug.com.au website cannot use certain words when trying to give consumers an honest opinion of a wine's merit. Thus thick black lines have started appearing on the small Barossa winery's tasting descriptions. Harem 'Fatima' Barossa Grenache Mataro 2012 Ben got a lot of pleasure from taking the initial building blocks and assembling them on the tasting bench to make the final 'Fatima' blend. The 'Layla' style of Grenache appeals to me and I am thrilled with the result, whereas the 'Fatima' is a deep rich,                                style which will last. Trennert McLaren Vale Grenache Shiraz 2013 Grenache no doubt dates back to the 1830s and was much liked in the days of making fortified wines as it gives heavy crops with high sugar. Smart wine makers have b...

Wine Australia wants to censor small Barossa winery from giving consumers an honest opinion

Image
Wine Australia is threatening to have a South Australian winemaker/retailer sent to jail for two years if he continues to use words like these on his website: 'This Tasmanian sparkling wine represents far better value than most champagnes.' The offending word is champagne even though it is not mentioned on the label. The wine bureaucrats argue that the very mention of the word on a website or in a printed description of a wine is illegal under legislation to ratify an agreement between Australia and the European Union. By David Farmer All wineries keep records which allows a check that wineries are doing the right thing and one role of Wine Australia is be the inspector or auditor. It is unexpected that they also have another role which is to control the use of particular terms and phrases which are grouped under a banner called  geographical indicators  often shortened to GIs. The Wine Australia email specifically mentions;  Rioja, Champagne, Cote du Rho...